The behaviour of Didier Drogba after the Champions League semi-final defeat against Barcelona may have been understandable but was not acceptable whichever way you look at it.
UEFA made a significant stand against this type of dissent by banning Drogba for four games and Jose Bosingwa, who made many offensive comments about the referee in later interviews, for three games.
Appealed
Chelsea did what any club would have been expected to do and they appealed against the punishments.
It was fully expected that UEFA would make a point that this type of behaviour was totally unacceptable and tell Chelsea to go forth and multiply.
Unfortunately, Chelsea pair Didier Drogba and Jose Bosingwa have now had their European bans reduced by one match by Uefa.
The thirty-one year old Chelsea striker Drogba successfully pleaded his case in person alongside twenty-six year old team-mate Bosingwa who had his ban reduced from three matches to two.
A suspended ban for another two games is still in place for Drogba. Bosingwa also has a one-match suspended ban. The suspended bans will be deferred for a probationary period of three years.
Fine
The fine imposed by Uefa on Chelsea of £86,000 for the club’s failings in the incident, will stand as originally proposed. A UEFA spokesperson said,
“The 100,000 euros fine imposed against Chelsea by the Uefa control and disciplinary body remains confirmed, for the improper conduct of their players and the throwing of missiles by their supporters at the match against Barcelona,â€Â
Let’s be honest, a fine of £86,000 is hardly going to be noticed by Abramovich and his cronies.
“We’re happy with the outcome and we’ve had a fair hearing,” said Chelsea lawyer Jim Sturman. Yes, I’m sure they are!!
Referee Ovrebo, who also appeared at the hearings, denied several penalty appeals in the match at Stamford Bridge. One or two of them were dubious, one or two of them were obvious.
The referee said the post-match incidents were “regrettable and occurred only because of the high emotions and frustrations which arose from the disappointment of a controversial defeat in such an important game.”
Difficult
Like everyone else, I watched the game between Chelsea and Barcelona and I found the decisions of Mr Ovrebo difficult to take even though I was relatively neutral. If I had been a Chelsea fan I would have been at least as angry as Drogba.
Despite that, UEFA had to make a point of dealing with the reaction of the Chelsea players and by reducing the penalties they have wasted a glorious opportunity. They have now sent a message that is entirely wrong for the game.
Anarchy
I am not being ultra politically correct here, I am simply saying that the referee and the match officials have to be shown a certain level of respect or we have a situation of anarchy within the game. UEFA have now said that anarchy is bad, but it is a little bit understandable. That is a terrible message to send.
If the reaction was relatively acceptable then UEFA have agreed that the refereeing was not acceptable. If that is the case, what are they going to do to punish Mr Ovrebo, and what are they going to do to ensure that such an inexperienced referee does not take charge of such an important game again?
Cheat
Drogba was out of order and a three match ban for shouting at a referee that he was a f**king cheat and having to be held back by security guards is pathetic.
I don’t want to see players stopped from playing the game but this decision sends completely the wrong message. They should have turned away the appeal and made a stand.
- Soccer News Like
- Be the first of your friends!