Sunday, December 22, 2024

Were the English FA right to hand Luis Suarez an eight match ban?

The English FA have handed Liverpool striker Luis Suarez an eight match ban after he was found guilty of misconduct.

The Uruguay international received this ban due to racially abusing Manchester United left-back Patrice Evra.

Racism

The English FA are looking to clamp down on racism within the Premier League and this punishment is seen as sending a message to others that racism isn’t acceptable in our game.

As I understand though the case has only been built on what Patrice Evra has stated.

I don’t think this would have been enough evidence in a court of law. Surely there must have been more evidence than just hearsay. Suarez has admitted to saying words that in his country is not offensive but in this country they are.

This ban could also have an effect on the on-going John Terry racism case. The England international was caught on camera allegedly racially abusing QPR defender Anton Ferdinand. The Chelsea defender looks set to face criminal charges with the CPS currently investigating the case.

If the Suarez ban is anything to go by Terry could be facing an even longer ban. The FA have to be seen to be treating everybody equally, so if it is proved that Terry is guilty he has to receive a long ban, England captain or not.

Disgusting

Racism is truly disgusting and I thought football had moved on from the bad old days. English football has made a big effort to stamp racism out of the game. Until recently it seemed that the horrible curse of racism had been almost eradicated from the Premier League.

However the unfortunate cases of Suarez and Terry has brought the subject to the fore again. It seems that racism will never die in football. Just like in modern society there are always people who will be prejudice towards people of other ethnicities.

Appeal

Liverpool are likely to appeal Luis Suarez’s eight match ban. The Reds may even challenge the case in court. The Liverpool hierarchy is said to be furious with the punishment handed out to the Uruguayan.

Liverpool have 14 days to appeal the ban and the £40,000 fine and are likely to do it at the first chance they get. They believe that the ban is excessive and that the player is being victimised. I don’t think the Liverpool board are going to take this laying down, rightly or wrongly they are challenging the verdict.

Precedent

The ban given to Luis Suarez sets a precedent for future cases. The FA have to be seen to take a stance against racism and they are right to ban Suarez. However I feel that an eight match ban was a bit excessive (and this is coming from an Everton fan).

Racism should be punished and the FA are attempting to do that. I feel the FA are trying to do the right thing in banning Suarez for eight games. Whether the decision is a right one or not I’m not sure. I’ll let you decide.

Were the FA right to ban Luis Suarez for eight games?

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

David Nugent


David is a freelance football writer with nearly a decade of experience writing about the beautiful game. The experienced writer has written for over a dozen websites and also an international soccer magazine offline.
Arguably his best work has come as an editorial writer for Soccernews, sharing his good, bad and ugly opinions on the world’s favourite sport. During David’s writing career he has written editorials, betting previews, match previews, banter, news and opinion pieces.

SHARE OR COMMENT ON THIS ARTICLE

WE RECOMMEND

  • russ ru

    0 0

    someone tell suarez that if utterin racist words is acceptable in his country, it isn’t over here! If players are gettin 6 to 8 month bans for failing drugs tests, (rio ferdinand, etc) then i STRONGLY feel the same should apply here. King kenny was on record as sayin they would accept whatever outcome. now the club is backtracking. If terry is found guilty he should be banned too! Both players are world class no doubt but to hell with that if they racist….

  • Brad

    0 0

    Dylan, I would say it’s the guys in the FA. Quite simply, Terry’s English. There always will be at least a little bias in that case. So racism still reigns supreme, just in a subtler form than the banana throwing, monkey noise making forms of expression of years past.

  • Dylan

    0 0

    The terry/suarez incidents are very interesting. with suarez you have a newly arrived player who knows little english using a word that he overheard man u players calling evra in an playful way. he received 8 matches. let’s not forget the hatred between liverpool and man u. also from what I understand evra was the only player who heard suarez use the word in question. next you have terry who is both the chelsea and england captain. he has no excuse for uttering what he said. from what i’ve read, several qpr players have verified that they heard what terry said to anton. this is not terry’s first incident in terms of improper abuse. a few years ago he was sent off in a game against spurs. when leaving the pitch he was said something racially charged although i believe the FA never acted upon it. and of course let’s not forget the wayne bridge scandal. all things considered from what I understand terry is to get off with a lighter punishment. and yet to me, that doesn’t seem quite right for whatever reason. does anyone care to explain?

  • Dylan

    0 0

    The terry/suarez incidents are very interesting. with suarez you have a newly arrived player who knows little english using a word that he overheard man u players calling evra in an playful way. he received 8 matches. let’s not forget the hatred between liverpool and man u. also from what I understand evra was the only player who heard suarez use the word in question. next you have terry who is both the chelsea and england captain. he has no excuse for uttering what he said. from what i’ve read, several qpr players have verified that they heard what terry said to anton. this is not terry’s first incident in terms of improper abuse. a few years ago he was sent off in a game against spurs. when leaving the pitch he was said something racially charged although i believe the FA never acted upon it. and of course let’s not forget the wayne bridge scandal. all things considered from what I understand terry is to get off with a lighter punishment. and yet to me, that doesn’t seem quite right for whatever reason. does anyone care to explain?

  • Brad

    0 0

    Dylan, I would say it’s the guys in the FA. Quite simply, Terry’s English. There always will be at least a little bias in that case. So racism still reigns supreme, just in a subtler form than the banana throwing, monkey noise making forms of expression of years past.

  • russ ru

    0 0

    someone tell suarez that if utterin racist words is acceptable in his country, it isn’t over here! If players are gettin 6 to 8 month bans for failing drugs tests, (rio ferdinand, etc) then i STRONGLY feel the same should apply here. King kenny was on record as sayin they would accept whatever outcome. now the club is backtracking. If terry is found guilty he should be banned too! Both players are world class no doubt but to hell with that if they racist….

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This field is required *

Join the conversation!

or Register

Live Scores

advertisement

Betting Guide Advertisement

advertisement

Become a Writer
More More
Top