Sunday, December 22, 2024

Why were the Premier League even considering play-offs?

According to Premier League chief executive Richard Scudamore the league have considered bringing in play-offs for the fourth Champions League spot.

The proposal was rejected but it’s left me wondering why it was even ever considered.

Proposal

The possibility of the teams who finished from fourth to seventh playing in play-offs, similar to those used in the football league was suggested.

However the idea was thrown out because the likes of Arsenal, Chelsea and Manchester United were against it.

Longer

The big clubs argued that play-offs would extend an already long season. It would force clubs to play even more games in a season. That argument makes sense but you can’t help thinking that they were looking after their own interests.

Scudamore told the Daily Telegraph: “ We had a look at it,” “ There was some interest but ultimately it was felt to stick with [the current system].”

Weak

The European Cup is no longer just for the champions of each country like it was in the olden days. That has resulted in clubs who aren’t even champions of their country becoming European Champions, which makes a mockery of the competition.

It would be strange if a club who finished sixth in the Premier League by some stroke of luck became European champions. It would make the competition look weak.

Money

The Champions League has just became a massive money making machine for the clubs involved. The competition has made the rich richer and opened up the gap between the big clubs and the smaller clubs.

The will to get into the big competition has caused some clubs to spend beyond their means. The prime example in the Premier League was Leeds United’s financial meltdown in the early 2000’s.

Games

I think that now that four Champions League spots have been established in the Premier League, that if a club finishes fourth then they deserve their chance to play in Europe’s elite competition.

It wouldn’t be fair for a team to have worked hard all season and finish fourth only to have to play more games. The team that finishes fourth in the Premier League already have to face a qualification game to make it into the Champions League group stages.

If the Premier League brought in play-offs for fourth place then the teams involved would hardly have a break from football at all.

Better

I think the only reason the Premier League even considered this was to make more money from television rights and sponsorship deals. It’s typical of the ideas that come out of the Premier League think-tank’s.

Maybe the Premier League should be concentrating on making the top flight better. Maybe they could examine the quality of officials in the top flight or look at introducing goal-line technology.

For now though the Premier League have seen sense and decided to leave things as they are.

Just

This season’s Champions League final on Saturday will be competed for by the champions of the two top leagues in Europe. They are the sort of teams that the Champions League is about, real champions competing to be crowned kings of Europe.

Would it be a good idea to bring in play-offs for the fourth Champions League spot?

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

David Nugent


David is a freelance football writer with nearly a decade of experience writing about the beautiful game. The experienced writer has written for over a dozen websites and also an international soccer magazine offline.
Arguably his best work has come as an editorial writer for Soccernews, sharing his good, bad and ugly opinions on the world’s favourite sport. During David’s writing career he has written editorials, betting previews, match previews, banter, news and opinion pieces.

SHARE OR COMMENT ON THIS ARTICLE

WE RECOMMEND

  • NEHEMIAH

    0 0

    The word “football”is one of the clear description of the game, therefore it should be recognized universally by that name.

  • Tsundzuka

    0 0

    Football, soccer, soccer, football. This is what makes it such a universal sport. It suites all cultures, even the americans, anyway(back to the point)

    Regarding the article, this is what you get when you have corporate bussinessmen running a sport, they really don’t understand the game and are only interested in how many games they can squeeze in a season for maximum profit.
    Since plattini took charge of Uefa/Eufa, it has become the best run organisations in the world

  • Brad

    0 0

    they call it football because. . . . . . damn, that’s a good question. but I guess we Americans have the same right to naming our sports, but surely we’d have taken more courtesy to other sports. I know that Australia’s recent boom in football is partly due to renaming it football rather than soccer.

  • Chelsea FC Fan

    0 0

    @bacon…there are so many things about American football that don’t make sense… except that it makes a lot of money…

  • Bacon

    0 0

    As an Englishman it annoys me to hear it called soccer, I mean we invented the sport, surely we get to name it lol.

    And, how come American Football is called football? Apart from running and the occasional kick its not even played with feet haha!

  • Brad

    0 0

    I know, especially with my relatives down in the Deep South. gosh. . . .

  • Chelsea FC Fan

    0 0

    Ya – I hate the word soccer personally…I prefer football, but most people around here look at you with screwface when you say football – like “wtf are you talking about?”

  • Brad

    0 0

    well, they were disillusioned by their ancestors into calling it soccer, even when it was one of the two most popular sports in the country (but this was actually before the World Cup was even founded, lol). thanks.

  • David Nugent

    0 0

    I find it refreshing that you prefer to call it football Brad, considering the majority of your countrymen seem to call it soccer.

  • Brad

    0 0

    let’s stick to calling it football, David. It’s an even more grueling sport than any of the American sports, they’re fun (excluding baseball, how can you call that a sport) but nothing compared to football. and it’s true how the NFL, MLB, NBA teams seem to scrap through regular season only to play great in the play-offs. very annoying when it happens.

  • Chelsea FC Fan

    0 0

    many of my friends here only tune in to the major sports during play-offs b/c it’s the only time you really see the true colors of every team…the regular season games have become a corporate nightmare…lack-lustre play and empty seats priced just right for your everyday board members and entrepreneurs who couldn’t care less about a game – all they want are the receipts to claim the game expenses back…is that the kind of fan base English football needs? I hope not.

    • David Nugent

      0 0

      Chelsea FC Fan, I completely agree with you. Although I’m not a big follower of American sports I know that play-offs can form an integral part of the teams seasons. I have nothing against play-offs in American sports but I think football/soccer is a very different sport.

  • Chelsea FC Fan

    0 0

    My personal opinion is to say no…

    I’ve lived in North America all my life and have been exposed to the playoff format in all North American sports…except soccer. As an observer, i’ve noticed the regular season is somewhat meaningless with teams just doing enough to scrape by until the real competition starts up…so, for 85% of the season, you’re left with mediocre play and good teams just doing enough to win rather than make it a spectacle. I love how soccer doesn’t incorporate playoffs b/c every game has meaning…it’s not about trying something here and there and seeing how it goes – from the opening whistle at the beginning of the season, teams come out to win and the pressure is on! I’m actually hoping ,with the NFL and NBA lock-outs that, the leagues would consider this format to preserve their players and add more excitement to the game…making the season longer only does damage to the players and this is not good for a business that relies on its players…

  • Brad

    0 0

    no use in a play off, this isn’t an American sport. . . or an, er, Americanized version of the beautiful game.

  • Brad

    0 0

    no use in a play off, this isn’t an American sport. . . or an, er, Americanized version of the beautiful game.

  • Chelsea FC Fan

    0 0

    My personal opinion is to say no…

    I’ve lived in North America all my life and have been exposed to the playoff format in all North American sports…except soccer. As an observer, i’ve noticed the regular season is somewhat meaningless with teams just doing enough to scrape by until the real competition starts up…so, for 85% of the season, you’re left with mediocre play and good teams just doing enough to win rather than make it a spectacle. I love how soccer doesn’t incorporate playoffs b/c every game has meaning…it’s not about trying something here and there and seeing how it goes – from the opening whistle at the beginning of the season, teams come out to win and the pressure is on! I’m actually hoping ,with the NFL and NBA lock-outs that, the leagues would consider this format to preserve their players and add more excitement to the game…making the season longer only does damage to the players and this is not good for a business that relies on its players…

  • Chelsea FC Fan

    0 0

    many of my friends here only tune in to the major sports during play-offs b/c it’s the only time you really see the true colors of every team…the regular season games have become a corporate nightmare…lack-lustre play and empty seats priced just right for your everyday board members and entrepreneurs who couldn’t care less about a game – all they want are the receipts to claim the game expenses back…is that the kind of fan base English football needs? I hope not.

    • David Nugent

      0 0

      Chelsea FC Fan, I completely agree with you. Although I’m not a big follower of American sports I know that play-offs can form an integral part of the teams seasons. I have nothing against play-offs in American sports but I think football/soccer is a very different sport.

  • Brad

    0 0

    let’s stick to calling it football, David. It’s an even more grueling sport than any of the American sports, they’re fun (excluding baseball, how can you call that a sport) but nothing compared to football. and it’s true how the NFL, MLB, NBA teams seem to scrap through regular season only to play great in the play-offs. very annoying when it happens.

  • David Nugent

    0 0

    I find it refreshing that you prefer to call it football Brad, considering the majority of your countrymen seem to call it soccer.

  • Brad

    0 0

    well, they were disillusioned by their ancestors into calling it soccer, even when it was one of the two most popular sports in the country (but this was actually before the World Cup was even founded, lol). thanks.

  • Chelsea FC Fan

    0 0

    Ya – I hate the word soccer personally…I prefer football, but most people around here look at you with screwface when you say football – like “wtf are you talking about?”

  • Brad

    0 0

    I know, especially with my relatives down in the Deep South. gosh. . . .

  • Bacon

    0 0

    As an Englishman it annoys me to hear it called soccer, I mean we invented the sport, surely we get to name it lol.

    And, how come American Football is called football? Apart from running and the occasional kick its not even played with feet haha!

  • Chelsea FC Fan

    0 0

    @bacon…there are so many things about American football that don’t make sense… except that it makes a lot of money…

  • Brad

    0 0

    they call it football because. . . . . . damn, that’s a good question. but I guess we Americans have the same right to naming our sports, but surely we’d have taken more courtesy to other sports. I know that Australia’s recent boom in football is partly due to renaming it football rather than soccer.

  • Tsundzuka

    0 0

    Football, soccer, soccer, football. This is what makes it such a universal sport. It suites all cultures, even the americans, anyway(back to the point)

    Regarding the article, this is what you get when you have corporate bussinessmen running a sport, they really don’t understand the game and are only interested in how many games they can squeeze in a season for maximum profit.
    Since plattini took charge of Uefa/Eufa, it has become the best run organisations in the world

  • NEHEMIAH

    0 0

    The word “football”is one of the clear description of the game, therefore it should be recognized universally by that name.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This field is required *

Join the conversation!

or Register

Live Scores

advertisement

Betting Guide Advertisement

advertisement

Become a Writer
More More
Top